Identify whether 920 and 924 Kelly Street share a meaningful utility, heating, or thermal-controls gap after prior rehabilitation, and whether ThermoVerse should be deployed across both buildings, one building, or neither based on the financial impact.
Track whether the paired site is moving from evidence-limited to underwriting-ready as utility bills, heating / controls records, shared-versus-separate systems data, rent / OpEx inputs, and ThermoVerse intervention assumptions become available.
Generate the full underwriting case: 10-year operating and capital exposure, paired-site reserve ambiguity, building-by-building systems diligence, right-sized defensibility capital, ThermoVerse deployment logic, assumptions, confidence bands, and decision conditions.
Convert underwriting into two-building utility evidence, systems-readiness materials, reserve logic, insurer documentation, and intervention-ready capital planning that clarify whether the correct next step is site-wide deployment, a single-building pilot, or no additional intervention.